ChatGPT Performance on Implantology Exam Questions
Featured
•
17m
This journal article investigates the performance of AI chatbots, specifically ChatGPT versions 3.5 and 4.0, when answering questions from the International Team of Implantology (ITI) certification exam for dentists. The study compared the scores of these AI models to those of licensed dentists, focusing on text-only multiple-choice questions due to the chatbots' limitations with images. The findings indicate that ChatGPT 4.0 performed comparably to human dentists, both achieving passing scores, while ChatGPT 3.5 scored lower than both. The authors conclude that AI chatbots hold potential as educational tools in dentistry, yet they also caution about the ethical implications of their use in online examinations, suggesting the need for further research and a consideration of their misuse.
1.Salem, M., Karasan, D., Revilla‐León, M., Barmak, A. B. & Sailer, I. Performance of Artificial Intelligence‐Based Chatbots (ChatGPT‐3.5 and ChatGPT‐4.0) Answering the International Team of Implantology Exam Questions. J. Esthet. Restor. Dent. (2025) doi:10.1111/jerd.13496.
Up Next in Featured
-
Exploring Classic and Modern Dental P...
In this episode, we dive into the world of dental photography bouncers, revisiting the classic pocket bouncer by Lumiquest and comparing it with modern 3D printed versions from Organic Dentistry and Sexy Ceramic. Learn how to use these tools effectively, their attachment methods, and the slight d...
-
Portrait Photography in Small Spaces:...
In this episode, we delve into the challenges of using macro lenses for portrait photography in small spaces. Highlighting the advantages of zoom lenses, the video showcases how a 16-55mm lens on an APS-C sensor camera, like the A6700, can be effectively utilized. By zooming out to 55mm, equivale...
-
3D-printed restorations may be consid...
This clinical trial investigates the long-term performance of 3D-printed resin composite fixed dental prostheses (FDPs) used for posterior teeth restorations over a three-year period. Researchers evaluated 68 FDPs in 49 patients, observing various parameters such as anatomical form, marginal adap...